From $600 Prototype to Industry Innovation: Paintjet’s Journey in Making Robotics Accessible to Traditional Contractors
The path to disrupting a traditional industry doesn’t always start with massive funding rounds or sophisticated technology. Sometimes, it begins with a simple college project and an insight about what’s actually possible. In a recent episode of Category Visionaries, Paintjet founder Nick Hegeman shared how a modest student project became the foundation for transforming the construction industry.
The Unexpected Beginning
The genesis of Paintjet wasn’t in a high-tech lab, but in a university classroom. “We actually were working, sponsored a senior design course for my alma mater at Purdue back in, I think, 2018,” Nick recalls. What emerged wasn’t sophisticated, but it proved something crucial: innovation in construction didn’t require massive initial investment.
“The tool that we had wasn’t crazy complex. It was more plausible than anything else. And it cost us five, $600, which was a vast cry of my expectations of it cost me $500,000,” Nick explains. This early prototype, while basic, provided the confidence to pursue something bigger.
Industry Experience as Market Research
What set Paintjet’s approach apart was their deep understanding of the market, gained through direct experience. Nick’s background as a certified painters franchise owner provided crucial insights: “That was really my biggest insights in terms of the depth of the labor shortage, but then also gave me a unique insight in terms of if we’re going to disrupt the space with technology, how that would need to happen.”
This firsthand experience revealed a fundamental truth about the industry: “Painting is one of those spaces that most people never intentionally get into… And 35 later, I’m selling painting. So what that means is that essentially, there’s been very little innovation in the space for about 50 years.”
Finding the Sweet Spot
Rather than trying to solve every painting challenge, Paintjet focused on where robotics could provide the most value. “When you look at, hey, what a robot is good at, they’re good at big, uniform, repetitive tasks. And when you’re looking at hundreds of thousands of square feet on a warehouse or a water tank or an oil tank or a ship hull, like, that’s the perfect fit for robotics.”
Building for Real-World Adoption
Understanding the industry’s financial constraints shaped their business model. Instead of selling expensive hardware, they developed a service-based approach: “How we work with our customers is we charge them on a per output per square foot painted by the robot, and that includes the operation.”
This model addressed a crucial barrier to adoption. As Nick explains, “Selling hardware and robotics to a painting contractor who has basically a zero capex budget is extremely challenging. Then you got to train them and support that.”
Scaling Through Simplicity
Their commitment to practical solutions extended to their operational model. “Our machine is small enough that it can fit in two pallets. And so we’ll just drop ship the pallets directly to the site,” Nick shares. This focus on operational simplicity has been crucial to their ability to scale.
Key Lessons for Founders
Paintjet’s journey offers valuable insights for founders looking to validate concepts with minimal resources:
- Start with a minimum viable solution that proves possibility
- Use industry experience to identify true pain points
- Focus on specific use cases where your technology provides clear value
- Design business models around customer constraints
- Prioritize operational simplicity from the beginning
The Path Forward
Today, Paintjet’s vision extends far beyond their initial prototype. “If you actually looked at our legal documents, we are forming technologies and DBA, Paintjet,” Nick reveals. Their success in commercializing robotics has positioned them to expand into adjacent services.
For founders looking to bring innovation to traditional industries, Paintjet’s story suggests that starting small and focusing on practical solutions might be more effective than attempting to build the perfect technology from day one. As Nick emphasizes, success comes from “solving the problem in the industry” rather than pushing technology for its own sake.