Sedicii’s Contrarian Bet: Why Ignoring Retail to Focus on Enterprise Won the Crypto Custody War

Sedicii’s Contrarian Bet: Why Ignoring Retail to Focus on Enterprise Won the Crypto Custody War

Every founder building in an emerging market faces the same dilemma: chase volume with a product-led growth motion, or build for complexity with an enterprise sales approach. In 2017, when crypto was exploding with retail interest, most companies made the obvious choice—they built for consumers. Sedicii made the opposite bet.

In a recent episode of Category Visionaries, Rob Leslie, Founder & CEO of Sedicii, explained the decision that would ultimately lead them to become the first federally chartered crypto bank in the United States. “We had this thesis early on that institutions were going to be the ones that were going to drive this industry forward,” Rob says. “And so we focused exclusively on institutions from day one.”

That word—exclusively—matters. This wasn’t a dual-track strategy or a hedge. While competitors built simple interfaces for millions of retail traders, Anchorage was building enterprise-grade custody infrastructure for a market that barely existed yet.

Why the Retail Path Looked Obvious

To understand why Anchorage’s choice was contrarian, you need to understand what the market looked like in 2017. Retail interest in crypto was exploding. Bitcoin was making headlines. Individual investors were opening accounts by the millions. The path to growth seemed clear: build a simple product, lower barriers to entry, and ride the wave of consumer adoption.

The data supported this approach. Retail meant faster sales cycles, lower customer acquisition costs, and the potential for viral growth. You could launch a product and see thousands of signups in weeks. The playbook existed—companies like Coinbase had already proven it worked.

Enterprise, by contrast, looked like the hard way. Longer sales cycles. Complex compliance requirements. Customers who would demand features that didn’t exist yet. Instead of thousands of users, you’d be fighting for dozens of accounts. Every deal would require custom work, legal review, and stakeholder buy-in across multiple departments.

For most founders, this would have been enough to choose retail. But Rob and his team saw something different.

The Insight Behind the Bet

Anchorage’s thesis wasn’t just about who would win in crypto—it was about how the entire industry would need to evolve for crypto to matter. “We basically had to go out and convince people that we were the right team to build this,” Rob explains. They understood that for digital assets to become a legitimate asset class, they needed institutional participation.

But institutions had requirements that the existing crypto infrastructure couldn’t meet. They needed custody solutions that satisfied regulators. Security that could protect billions in assets. Compliance frameworks that aligned with decades of financial services regulation. Insurance that covered edge cases no one had thought about yet.

None of this existed in 2017. And retail-focused companies had no incentive to build it. Their customers didn’t need institutional-grade infrastructure—they needed fast, simple, cheap access to trading.

This created an opening. If Anchorage could build what institutions needed, they’d have a market with almost no competition. The downside was that building this infrastructure would be expensive, time-consuming, and technically complex. The upside was that anyone who tried to compete later would face the same barriers.

What Focusing Exclusively on Enterprise Actually Meant

The decision to focus on institutions wasn’t just about sales strategy—it shaped everything about how Anchorage operated. Product development was driven entirely by institutional requirements. “We were very customer-obsessed from the beginning,” Rob says. “We would basically build whatever our customers needed.”

This meant building features that would never matter to retail users. Multi-signature security protocols that required multiple parties to authorize transactions. Compliance integrations with systems that institutions already used. Audit trails that could satisfy regulatory examinations. Insurance coverage that protected against scenarios retail users never considered.

It also meant accepting slower growth in the early years. While competitors announced millions of users, Anchorage was signing dozens of institutional accounts. Each deal took months to close. “We spent a lot of time educating the market on what custody is, why it matters, what the risks are,” Rob explains.

The education process itself was resource-intensive. Institutions needed to understand not just Anchorage’s product, but the entire problem space of digital asset custody. Rob and his team became teachers as much as salespeople, investing time in explaining concepts that seem obvious to crypto natives but were foreign to traditional finance professionals.

Where the Moat Came From

The real genius of Anchorage’s strategy became apparent when they pursued a federal banking charter. “We always believed that regulation was coming and that the companies that were prepared for it were going to be the winners,” Rob says.

Pursuing the charter was a natural extension of their institutional focus. But it was also something that would have been nearly impossible for a retail-focused company to justify. “We spent probably two years working on getting our charter,” Rob reveals. “It was a massive undertaking.”

Two years and significant capital investment to get regulatory approval makes sense when your customers are institutions that require that level of oversight. It makes no sense when your customers are individual traders who want fast, frictionless access to crypto markets.

The charter became Anchorage’s ultimate competitive moat. “Having that charter opened up a lot of doors for us,” Rob explains. “It gave us credibility with institutions that otherwise would have been very skeptical.”

More importantly, it gave them access to customers that competitors literally couldn’t serve. “There are certain customers that will only work with federally chartered institutions,” Rob notes. These weren’t small accounts—they were the largest, most sophisticated institutions in the world, managing billions in assets.

The Referral Engine That Made It Sustainable

Enterprise strategies live or die on customer retention and referrals. With high acquisition costs and long sales cycles, you can’t afford to constantly replace churned customers. Anchorage built this into their DNA from day one.

“Once you get a few customers, they start referring you to other customers,” Rob says. But he immediately adds the critical qualifier: “You have to make sure you’re delivering a really good product and really good service.”

In enterprise markets, especially in financial services, reputation compounds faster than in retail. “In enterprise, your reputation is everything,” Rob emphasizes. “If you do a good job for your first customers, they’ll help you get your next customers. If you do a bad job, word travels fast.”

This dynamic made Anchorage’s focus on service quality not just good practice, but essential to their GTM strategy. Every implementation became a reference point for future sales. Every customer success became a case study that opened doors with similar institutions.

Why This Strategy Won’t Work for Everyone

Anchorage’s approach worked because they correctly identified a future where institutions would dominate crypto adoption. But their success doesn’t mean every company should choose enterprise over retail.

The strategy required enormous patience. Years of slower growth while competitors scaled faster. The ability to attract capital despite lower user numbers. Technical capabilities to build institutional-grade infrastructure. And perhaps most importantly, the conviction to stay focused when the retail market was booming.

Rob’s insight was recognizing that in emerging markets, the companies that win aren’t always the ones that grow fastest initially. Sometimes they’re the ones that build for where the market is going, not where it is today. “You can’t just build custom stuff for every single customer,” Rob acknowledges. “You have to figure out what the common problems are and build products that solve those common problems.”

Anchorage’s bet on institutions over retail wasn’t just about choosing a target market. It was about understanding that creating defensible value in crypto required building infrastructure that only institutions would demand—infrastructure that would become increasingly valuable as the industry matured and regulation arrived.

The result: while competitors fought over retail users in an increasingly commoditized market, Anchorage owned the institutional segment and became the first federally chartered crypto bank. The harder path became the winning path.