Beyond MVPs: How Orum Rewrote the Rules for Launching Infrastructure Products

Beyond MVPs: How Orum Rewrote the Rules for Launching Infrastructure Products

The startup world’s mantra of “launch fast and iterate” has achieved almost religious status. But in a recent Category Visionaries episode, Orum founder Stephany Kirkpatrick revealed why this approach can be catastrophic for infrastructure companies – and how her team developed a different playbook.

When Fast Fails

Early in Orum’s journey, Stephany discovered a fundamental truth about infrastructure products: customer trust requires completeness. “People don’t want to switch money movement providers when it’s not complete. People don’t necessarily believe that you’re going to have something unique and better and differentiated until they can experience it and run a payment on it,” she explains.

This insight challenged conventional MVP wisdom. While consumer apps can launch with limited features, payment infrastructure demands a higher standard from day one.

Redefining Minimum

Rather than abandoning the MVP concept entirely, Orum redefined what “minimum” means for infrastructure. As Stephany notes, “We might apply the Minimum Viable Product MVP concept to it, meaning it doesn’t have parity with a bank, for example, but it’s also not supposed to, but it also can’t stop functioning.”

This required a delicate balance – launching with enough functionality to be reliable while still maintaining room for innovation.

The Stealth Advantage

Instead of rushing to market, Orum took a more measured approach. “We spent a lot of time in stealth mode. So our private beta came out at the beginning of last year and that allowed us to really cultivate a very strong platform,” Stephany shares.

This extended development period wasn’t about perfectionism – it was about building the foundation for trust. When you’re handling other companies’ money movement, there’s no room for “move fast and break things.”

Building for Scale from Day One

The team recognized that infrastructure demands a different kind of scalability. As Stephany explains, “Payments is actually a very deep form of innovation.” This meant building systems that could handle not just current needs, but future innovations.

This forward-looking approach influenced everything from technical architecture to customer support. “We spend a lot of time making sure that people know not just under the right kind of instant payout feature, but how to truly optimize it,” Stephany notes.

Evolution Over Revolution

Even after launch, Orum’s approach to product development remained measured. “Even recently, I would say we’ve learned a lot about how we, one, we’re structuring pricing, and two, how were positioning it. They’re two different things,” Stephany shares.

This ongoing refinement reflects a crucial truth about infrastructure: it’s better to be reliable than revolutionary. Customers need to trust that your service will work consistently before they’ll consider innovative features.

The Future-Ready Framework

Looking ahead, Orum’s careful approach to launching infrastructure has positioned them to enable broader innovation. As Stephany puts it, “We really feel like we’re enablers of what will become net new categories of innovation and infrastructure that goes beyond just the payments piece.”

The lesson for infrastructure founders? Sometimes going slower at the start lets you move faster in the long run. As Stephany concludes, “We want to be always that first phone call that you make when you’re thinking about building a company and you know you’re going to do payouts or you’re going to do money movement because everything else that you’re building should go faster as a result of working with a partner like Orum.”

In a world obsessed with speed, Orum’s story reminds us that building lasting infrastructure sometimes requires rewriting the rules of product development. The key is finding the right balance between reliability and innovation – a balance that starts well before your first line of code.