The Pre-Seed Playbook: How Balcony VC Evaluates Technical Founders

The Pre-Seed Playbook: How Balcony VC Evaluates Technical Founders

Making pre-seed investments requires a different playbook than later-stage venture capital. In a recent episode of Category Visionaries, Axel Bichara shared how Balcony VC’s unique approach to evaluating technical founders stems from decades of experience on both sides of the table.

The Decision Framework

Balcony VC’s investment decisions rest on two fundamental criteria. As Axel explains, “We look primarily at two criteria when we invest. One is exceptional founder or founding team… somebody who’s done really interesting things in their lives is number one. And then number two, it needs to be a large market opportunity.”

This seemingly simple framework masks a deeper understanding of what makes technical founders successful. “Creative technologists,” as Balcony VC calls them, are “People who understand technology but who have the creativity to see into the future, 5-10 years into the future and leverage trends in society to a vision for a company and are able to articulate that.”

Beyond Traditional Due Diligence

The firm’s evaluation process goes deeper than typical venture assessment. “Who are your co-founders? Who are your employees, but also who are your advisors, who are your board members?” Axel asks. “You’re only as good as a team you’re playing on.”

This comprehensive view of team building becomes particularly important at the pre-seed stage, where the founding team’s ability to attract talent and advisors can make or break the company.

The Partnership Model

Unlike many modern venture firms, Balcony VC takes a hands-on partnership approach. “We lead pre-seed rounds, and there are actually very few people who do that, go in with conviction and write half a million, $2 million check when one, two, or three founders first get started,” Axel notes.

This early-stage focus requires a different kind of relationship. As Axel puts it, “managing a venture firm is also a company, right? You have investors, you have a team, you have management issues.”

Red Flags in Technical Teams

One major red flag is premature scaling. “It is quite common to be too optimistic about achieving product market fit and business model proof. So people ramp up to burn rates too quickly,” Axel warns.

Another warning sign is an incomplete solution. “If you solve 99% of somebody’s problem, nobody will buy the product. You need to solve 100% of your customers problem.” This perfectionist approach to product development is especially crucial for technical products.

Green Lights: What Balcony VC Looks For

Capital efficiency stands out as a key positive indicator. “It is more than ever capital efficiency and low burn rates, especially until you have product market fit and business model proof,” Axel emphasizes.

The firm also looks for founders who understand execution is key: “Every company becomes what we call an execution play eventually, where you just need to execute really well over many years to win against competition and get ready for that.”

The Current Market Context

Today’s market environment makes this evaluation framework even more relevant. “What has changed in the last year is that we are coming back to a more normal business environment which is likely to make it more difficult to make investments, build companies, going to be more back to the fundamentals of business building,” Axel observes.

Looking Forward

For technical founders seeking pre-seed investment, the message is clear: focus on fundamentals, build strong teams, and maintain capital efficiency. As Axel reminds us, “in the long term, you really only make money if you build great businesses.”

The most successful technical founders combine vision with execution, understanding that while technology creates opportunities, building great companies requires much more. In today’s market, this comprehensive approach to founder evaluation is more relevant than ever.