The Responsiv Method: Converting In-House Legal Teams from Outside Counsel to AI Tools

The Responsiv Method: Converting In-House Legal Teams from Outside Counsel to AI Tools

Every call to outside counsel costs thousands. For in-house legal teams, this creates a painful choice: spend the money or make decisions without proper legal research. In a recent Category Visionaries episode, Responsiv founder Jordan Domash revealed their strategy for solving this dilemma.

The key was understanding the budget dynamics. “There’s budget for in house people and tools. And then there’s also a separate budget that often rolls up to the general counsel in terms of outside council spend,” Jordan explains. This insight shaped their entire sales approach.

Rather than competing for software budget, Responsiv positioned their solution against outside counsel spend. The pitch resonated because it addressed a common frustration: “They pick up the phone, call outside counsel, spend $1,000, $2,000, because there isn’t really an alternative.”

But selling AI to lawyers requires more than just cost savings. “You don’t want to get something wrong. And their whole job is managing risk for the company,” Jordan notes. Their experience building AI tools at Relativity provided crucial credibility: “I’ve been building AI enabled tools for attorneys for ten years.”

This background helped them address key concerns about AI adoption. “There’s incredible interest and it’s really easy to get a attorney to take a demo of what we’re building. But at the same time there’s a natural concern for folks that aren’t really close to the underlying tech.” These concerns centered on AI hallucination risk and data privacy.

Their targeting strategy focused on two key segments: regulated industries with complex legal needs and high-growth tech companies facing new challenges daily. As Jordan explains, “If I’m a solo GC at a tech company, right, maybe my expertise is in m and A or transactions and now I’m dealing with privacy or employment in all these different jurisdictions.”

The value proposition was clear: instead of calling outside counsel for every new issue, in-house teams could quickly research and make decisions on low-risk, everyday questions. This preserved outside counsel budget for truly complex issues where “they have the bet the company issue, the risky challenge that really needs expert support.”

This approach generated rapid adoption through word-of-mouth. “Most of the new customers that we’ve signed in the past month or two have come from referrals from existing customers,” Jordan reveals. They achieved this without traditional marketing – their product remained behind a waitlist.

The strategy worked because it aligned with how in-house teams actually work. Traditional legal research platforms were built for law firms doing deep research. But as Jordan notes, in-house counsel “don’t have time to go read 30 cases.” They needed quick answers to specific questions.

For founders selling to risk-averse buyers, Responsiv’s approach offers valuable lessons. By deeply understanding budget dynamics, addressing specific workflow needs, and building trust through proven expertise, they’ve created a playbook for displacing expensive legacy solutions with AI-powered alternatives.