Fourth Power’s Market Entry Blueprint: Why This Deep Tech Startup Chose to Work Within the System Instead of Disrupting It

Fourth Power’s Market Entry Blueprint: Why This Deep Tech Startup Chose to Work Within the System Instead of Disrupting It

Most founders entering regulated markets see regulations as barriers to break through. But in a recent episode of Category Visionaries, Fourth Power CEO Arvin Ganesan revealed why his company took the opposite approach: embracing the regulatory framework as a path to market success.

Understanding the System’s Origins The story begins with history. “You go way back to the early 1900s, and Thomas Edison has his Pearl street station in New York, a first power plant,” Arvin explains. “The kind of streetscape in New York was just like wire after wire. I’m an Edison customer. I’m a customer of this generator. And it was a completely deregulated system.”

This chaos led to our modern regulatory framework. “What ended up happening over time, particularly with TBA’s expansion and the new deal in the forties, was that there’s a trade made, which is utilities got monopoly rights to specific areas… in exchange for that monopoly right, they were guaranteed a rate of return. But that rate of return had to be approved by regulators.”

The Strategic Choice Understanding this history shaped Fourth Power’s market entry strategy. “One of the biggest reasons we’re saying we’re going to be a successful company is we understand the nature of what it means to be an energy company,” Arvin notes. “Is it the design that everybody in the world wants? No, not necessarily. But is the design we have? Yeah.”

Aligning with Customer Needs Rather than fighting the system, Fourth Power aligned their technology with existing utility operations. “We’ve designed our battery to provide kind of exact same control systems as a natural gas plant, to have instant response time, just like a natural gas plant would,” Arvin explains. This approach makes their innovation feel familiar and trustworthy to utilities.

The Customization Strategy They recognized that “every grid is going to be unique, every utility is unique. So we build products that are very bespoke to what any individual utility or customer wants.” This customization approach acknowledges the diverse needs within the regulatory framework rather than trying to force a one-size-fits-all solution.

Speaking the Language Even their marketing reflects this collaborative approach. “When we talk with our customers, we’re not talking about leading with carbon,” Arvin reveals. “We talk about how we’re able to make their avoided cost tests when it comes to integrated rate plans easier for storage.”

The Long-Term Vision This strategy requires patience. Their commercialization timeline – demonstration in 2025, pilot in 2026, first gigawatt-hour battery in 2028-2029 – aligns with utility planning cycles. As Arvin puts it, “That’s the best part about being so focused on our customer, which is when you have a motivated customer you’re working with, you’re able to understand and work within these timelines.”

Advice for Deep Tech Founders For founders entering regulated markets, Arvin’s advice is clear: “Don’t try to break it. Don’t have the first thing you try to do for the approach you try to take to say, ‘hey, this doesn’t make sense, we’re going to break it and start something over.'” Instead, he advocates for understanding why regulations exist and finding ways to innovate within them.

The lesson? Sometimes the fastest path to market isn’t through disruption but through deep understanding and strategic alignment with existing systems. As Arvin concludes, “I’m not saying don’t ever try to change the existing paradigm, but if you’re going to do it, be very informed on what you’re breaking and what you’re changing.”