The Verdant Robotics Playbook: Transitioning from Service to Product-Based Business Model
When technical founders build hardware companies, conventional wisdom suggests starting with a service model to reduce customer risk. But sometimes, the market demands a different approach. In a recent episode of Category Visionaries, Gabe Sibley shared how Verdant Robotics navigated this critical business model transition.
The Initial Service-Based Strategy
Verdant’s journey into agricultural robotics began with a service-first mindset, influenced by the founding team’s operational experience. As Gabe explains: “My Co-Founder had operated the largest tomato operation in the world, so he knew what running a service was like. We thought, okay, we’ll try and run it as a service.”
The service model seemed logical – it would lower the adoption barrier for farmers and give Verdant more control over the technology’s implementation. But the market had other ideas.
Customer Demand Drives the Pivot
The push to transition came directly from their customers, particularly larger agricultural operations. Gabe recalls the moment clearly: “I just remember a very large customer saying, basically we’re not going to rent it, but we’ll buy it. Okay.”
This wasn’t an isolated request. The farming industry’s established purchasing patterns and financial models favored ownership over service subscriptions. As Gabe notes: “The growers want it as something they can buy. That’s the model they are used to. They understand total cost of ownership, and they’re very used to financing large capital equipment purchases anyway.”
Adapting to Market Reality
Instead of resisting this market preference, Verdant embraced it. Their approach to the transition reflected a fundamental business philosophy that Gabe articulates simply: “If the customer wants it like x, you say okay. They want to like why you say okay… ultimately the value is there and how you get that in the hands of the growers almost doesn’t matter.”
This flexibility proved crucial because their core value proposition remained strong regardless of the business model. Their technology was “taking something that costs $3,000 an acre and doing it for $30 an acre through technology.” With such compelling economics, the delivery model became secondary to getting the technology into customers’ hands.
Managing the Transition
Interestingly, Verdant didn’t completely abandon their service model. Gabe acknowledges: “I wouldn’t say a mistake, but it’s not the fastest path to market because there’s still value running as a service for smaller growers that might not want to buy their kit outright.”
This hybrid approach helped them serve different market segments while transitioning their primary business model. The decision became even clearer as customer demand continued to grow. As Gabe states: “The customers, I’ve found, in my experience, are chomping at the bit… We’re really being pulled by the nose, and we’re more supply limited than we are demand limited.”
Lessons for Technical Founders
Verdant’s experience offers several key insights for founders navigating business model transitions:
- Let customer preference guide your model, even if it contradicts your initial assumptions
- Different market segments may require different approaches
- When value proposition is strong, flexibility in delivery model becomes possible
- Listen to large customers’ purchasing preferences – they often reflect deeper market dynamics
Perhaps most importantly, Gabe’s experience suggests that founders shouldn’t become too attached to their initial business model. As he puts it: “You know, if you can prove that there’s value they’re in and there’s no convincing needed because they are clever and they understand what’s happening.”
The key is creating value – how you deliver it should adapt to market preferences rather than forcing customers to adapt to your preferred model.